Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (61)
- Article (59)
- Working Paper (16)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Preprint (12)
- Lecture (10)
- Book (3)
- Report (3)
- Other (2)
Language
- English (178) (remove)
Keywords
- Ökosystem (15)
- Antike (12)
- Klimaänderung (12)
- Region Berlin-Brandenburg (10)
- Wasserhaushalt (10)
- Biowissenschaften (8)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (8)
- Kunstgeschichte (8)
- Denkmalpflege (7)
- Historische Gärten (7)
Has Fulltext
- yes (178)
Institute
- Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (45)
- Veröffentlichungen von Akademiemitgliedern (25)
- Akademienvorhaben Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance (14)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Globaler Wandel (13)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Gegenworte - Hefte für den Disput über Wissen (8)
- Akademienvorhaben Alexander-von-Humboldt-Forschung (7)
- Drittmittelprojekt Ökosystemleistungen (7)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Historische Gärten im Klimawandel (7)
- Akademienvorhaben Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm (6)
- Akademienvorhaben Strukturen und Transformationen des Wortschatzes der ägyptischen Sprache. Text- und Wissenskultur im alten Ägypten (6)
Modern brain research related to consciousness has resulted in many interesting in- sights, for example into the neurobiological basis of attention and of language. In biological terms, human consciousness appears as a system’s feature of our brain, with neural processes strictly following the laws of physics. This does not necessarily imply, however, that there can be a general and comprehensive scientific theory of consciousness. Predictions of the extent to which such a theory may become possi- ble vary widely in the scientific community. There are reasons - not only practical but also epistemological - why the brain-mind relation may not be fully decodable by finite procedures. In particular, analogies with mathematical theorems of un- decidability suggest that self-referential features of consciousness, such as multiple self-representations like those involved in strategic thought, may not be fully resolv- able by brain analysis. Assuming such limitations exist, this implies that ob jective analysis cannot exhaust sub jective experience in principle. A person’s consciousness and will are accessible to external observation only within limits. In some respects, we do not even learn to know ourselves except by our actions. It thus appears that a scientific look at consciousness and the human mind, combining universal physi- calism with epistemological scepticism, is not inconsistent with certain concepts of sub jectivity that are current in the humanities, despite all the differences in the style and terminology of discourse.
Emergence, analysis and optimization of structures - Concepts and strategies across disciplines
(2007)
Some drawings from the >Paper Museum< of Cassiano dal Pozzo and the Berlin Codex Destailleur >D<
(2004)
The future of biological diversity in a crowded world (Ernst Mayr Lecture on 29th October 2002)
(2006)
Introduction : The Grants, Dreaming Darwin's Dream ; (Ernst Mayr Lecture am 4. November 2004)
(2006)
Mind, Matter and Mathematics
(2008)
A reaction to the article „The Lost Archive“, The Wall Street Journal 12.1.2008, page 1 (US edition) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120008793352784631.html The belief in the myth that old manuscripts should be mysterious and powerful is part and parcel of the age of Modernity. That such expectations were operative in the discussion on the Qumran fragments is still remembered, and more recently the Da Vinci Code, in itself a quite shallow story, sold extremely well. The fact that the Wall Street Journal placed an article on the “lost Bergsträsser-film archive” of Qur’anic manuscripts on its front page on 12th of January seems to be due to the myth of “textual wars” taking place in the world.
Psychology's territories - historical and contemporary perspective from different disciplines
(2007)
What determines the territories of psychology? How have the boundaries of psychological research and practice been developed in history, and how might or should they be changed nowadays? This volume presents new approaches to these questions, resulting from a three-year collaboration among internationally known psychologists, neuroscientists, social scientists and historians and philosophers of science from Germany and the United States under the auspices of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. The authors reflect critically on traditional and current views of psychology on the basis of focused historical and contemporary case studies of three broad topic areas: How have psychological concepts been used in disciplines such as psychology, philosophy, or neuroscience, as well as in daily life? Has the use of instruments in psychological research expanded or restricted the discipline’s reach? And how have applications of psychological thinking and research worked in practical contexts? The volume thus presents essays that investigate the separations as well as the interactions between psychology and its neighboring disciplines and, moreover, essays that try to overcome disciplinary distinctions in exemplary ways. The contributions aim to make historical and philosophical studies of psychology relevant to contemporary concerns, and to show how psychology can profit from better interdisciplinary cooperation, thus improving mutual understanding between different scientific cultures.
Full applicability of physics to human biology does not necessarily imply that one can uncover a comprehensive, algorithmic correlation between physical brain states and corresponding mental states. The argument takes into account that information processing is finite in principle in a finite world. Presumbly the brain-mind-relation cannot be resolved in all essential aspects, particularly when high degrees of abstraction or self-analytical processes are involved. Our conjecture plausibly unifies the universal validity of physics and a logical limitation of human thought, and it does not regard consciousness -the most basic human experience - as a marginal phenomenon. ++++ RATIO appeared up to 1987 in both a German and an English version. The German title of this article: Alfred Gierer, Der physikalische Grundlegungsversuch in der Biologie und das psychophysische Problem. RATIO XII, Heft 1, 1970, S. 40-54.