Refine
Year of publication
- 1998 (103) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (59)
- Article (37)
- Book (2)
- Other (2)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Annualreport (1)
Keywords
- Akademische Freiheit (13)
- Forschungsfreiheit (13)
- Wissenschaftsfreiheit (13)
- Fälschung (9)
- wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten (6)
- Regulierung (5)
- Betrug (4)
- Wiedervereinigung (4)
- Wissenschaft (4)
- Afrikawissenschaften (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (103)
Institute
- Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (58)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Gegenworte - Hefte für den Disput über Wissen (36)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Wissenschaften und Wiedervereinigung (28)
- Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Die Herausforderung durch das Fremde (13)
- Akademienvorhaben Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (1)
- Veröffentlichungen von Akademiemitgliedern (1)
The principal objective of this article is to reflect (in a philosophical manner) on recent developments in moral legislation in The Netherlands. The term ›moral legislation‹ refers to all forms of legislation on issues which can be regarded as ›moral‹ – such as euthanasia and animal experimentation. The reason for focussing on The Netherlands is that, on an international level, it is a country which has gained a reputation for being ›liberal‹, and is therefore admired by some and held in abhorrence by others.
This essay examines the notion of the intellectual as a foreigner in hisher own land and its central importance for the self-understanding of intellectuals in the late 18th century. By attempting to narrate the history of motivs and characteristic topoi of speech, the authors identify an intemal foreigness or feeling of not belonging which manifests itself as an exclusion of the self and the foreign in the modes of polemics. Intellectuals stylize or masquerade themselves as foreigners to call into question the dismantling of their social circumstances and the indignity of their own position.
Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat 1997 einen ›Ehrenkodex‹ für die Wissenschaft verkündet, worin u. a. Plagiat und Fälschung von Daten als Tatbestände wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens identifiziert und Gutachter zur Offenlegung möglicher Befangenheit verpflichtet wurden. Die Regeln selbst erscheinen selbstverständlich, ohne daß jedem bewußt wäre, warum es gerade diese sind und keine anderen. Hierüber handelt der vorliegende Aufsatz unter Berücksichtigung von Mertons Verhaltensregeln und der veränderten Bedingungen der Wissensproduktion.
This study emphasizes the significance of language politics for a process of nation building and national self-identity as exemplified by France and Frenchspeaking Africa. Based on linguistic differences (between foreign languages and foreign language, one's own language and ones native language etc.) the foreign is identified in the field of language politics and is required in order to identify the domestic language as such. The privileging of national languages subsequently goes along with the marginalization and exclusion of other languages. That which can be considered foreign includes, on the one hand, a language used by an elite (Latin) or colonial power (the French in Afrika) and, on the other hand, foreign can be that which is excluded from the dominant language practices.