Refine
Document Type
- Preprint (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Archäologie (1)
- Begrenzte Rationalität (1)
- Bewusstsein (1)
- Evolution (1)
- Gemeinsinn (1)
- Gödel (1)
- Heisenberg (1)
- Keramik (1)
- Kooperation (1)
- Moralismus (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Institute
- Veröffentlichungen von Akademiemitgliedern (3) (remove)
Modern brain research related to consciousness has resulted in many interesting in- sights, for example into the neurobiological basis of attention and of language. In biological terms, human consciousness appears as a system’s feature of our brain, with neural processes strictly following the laws of physics. This does not necessarily imply, however, that there can be a general and comprehensive scientific theory of consciousness. Predictions of the extent to which such a theory may become possi- ble vary widely in the scientific community. There are reasons - not only practical but also epistemological - why the brain-mind relation may not be fully decodable by finite procedures. In particular, analogies with mathematical theorems of un- decidability suggest that self-referential features of consciousness, such as multiple self-representations like those involved in strategic thought, may not be fully resolv- able by brain analysis. Assuming such limitations exist, this implies that ob jective analysis cannot exhaust sub jective experience in principle. A person’s consciousness and will are accessible to external observation only within limits. In some respects, we do not even learn to know ourselves except by our actions. It thus appears that a scientific look at consciousness and the human mind, combining universal physi- calism with epistemological scepticism, is not inconsistent with certain concepts of sub jectivity that are current in the humanities, despite all the differences in the style and terminology of discourse.
In drei Fallstudien werden Aspekte der Entwicklung der ägyptischen Keramik im Zeitraum vom Alten zum Mittleren Reich (ca. 2700-1900 v.Chr.) analysiert. Die dabei erhobenen archäologischen Befunde werden jeweils in den Kontext der soziokulturellen Gesamtsituation gestellt und vor diesem Hintergrund als Ergebnis der Anpassung an die sozialen Rahmenbedingungen sowie der Optimierung unter den jeweils spezifischen Verhältnissen interpretiert. Dabei werden die staatswirtschaftlich geprägte Organisationsform des hohen Alten Reiches und die dezentrale Breitenkultur, die im ausgehenden Alten Reich entsteht, in ihren Auswirkungen auf die keramische Produktion kontrastiert.