Refine
Document Type
- Preprint (7)
- Working Paper (4)
- Book (2)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Article (1)
Keywords
- Landnutzung (8)
- Ökosystemleistungen (6)
- Ökosystem (5)
- Kulturlandschaft (3)
- Biodiversität (2)
- Driving forces (2)
- Geoinformationssystem (2)
- Politik (2)
- ecosystem services (2)
- Accounting (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
This study explores the potential of historical maps to detect, measure and monitor changes of trees outside forests. The main goal is to assess local-level changes of scattered trees and orchards and their land-use determinants in two areas in Southern Germany between 1901/1905 and 2009. Firstly, overall landscape changes are recorded. Secondly, the spatial-temporal trajectories of scattered trees and their land-use determinants are identified. Thirdly, changes in quantity and fragmentation patterns of traditional orchards are analyzed in their relationship to overall land-cover change. The results confirm major losses in scattered trees, mainly due to urbanization, agricultural intensification, and land abandonment. They further reveal that, while orchards have persisted in total area, they have undergone critical changes towards a simplified landscape structure and loss of the traditional land-use mosaic, which is a characterizing feature of high nature value landscapes. Multi-temporal assessment showed that most trends have been continuous and did not change directions over time, but rather accelerated during periods of rapid change (most dramatically in the 1950-1990 period). The case of orchards and scattered trees illustrates a major problem of cultural landscapes in Europe: Semi-natural landscape features of high nature value are threatened by both intensification and abandonment of land uses. This makes their conservation a potentially costly enterprise, as both opportunity costs for lost alternative land uses and for conservation management costs arise.
In diesem Politikpapier definieren die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler der Nachwuchsgruppe Ökosystemleistungen sieben Leitlinien für die Sicherung und Förderung von Ökosystemleistungen in Kulturlandschaften. Sie zeigen auf, wie diese in dem in Deutschland bestehenden Politikgefüge konkretisiert und implementiert werden können.
Over millennia human well-being has benefited from ecosystems, not only through tangible goods, but also through intangible assets known as cultural ecosystem services. Despite growing research over the last decade, cultural services assessment still remains arbitrary and is largely limited to marketable services such as tourism. Evident difficulties in standardizing definitions and measurements have challenged cultural services accounting in decision making processes. However, the imminent formation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services offers an opportunity to counterbalance this misrepresentation by establishing a scientific basis for consistently assessing cultural services. In that regard, the current review intends to facilitate discussion investigating the current state of cultural services accounting by offering an appraisal of existing evidence regarding cultural services indicator quality. The current review builds on scientifically recognized frameworks to develop a holistic understanding of how cultural services indicators are conceived within ecosystem services research. Among the measures found, benefit indicators were most frequently used for assessing inspirational, educational and recreational services. A broad variety of methods for accounting cultural services was found, mainly due to the varied aims of the studies. Most of the cultural services indicators were deficient concerning their clarity of definitions, purposes and understanding of the processes to be measured and referring only marginally to tradeoffs and bundles with other services. Only 17% performed multitemporal assessments and 23% used spatially explicit information. It seems that cultural services indicators quality could be greatly enhanced by investing more effort towards involving relevant stakeholders in conceptualization and communication phases, using participatory mapping tools to enhance visibility.
Nicht erst im Europäischen Jahr für Kulturerbe (2018) werden historische Landschaftsgärten und andere Kulturdenkmäler weniger als Kostenfaktor gesehen, sondern als Ressource, die als weicher Standortfaktor zu Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Entstehung von Arbeitsplätzen und regionaler Entwicklung führt. Direkter ökonomischer Nutzen entsteht beispielsweise in den Bereichen Tourismus, Immobilienwirtschaft und Exportwirtschaft. Indirekter Nutzen kann sich durch Beiträge zum menschlichen Wohlbefinden, zum Heimatgefühl oder zur historischen Identität einer Region entfalten. Entsprechend wird beispielsweise von der Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Cultural Heritage der Europäischen Kommission gefordert, Kulturerbe als Querschnittsthema in verschiedenen Politikfeldern zu verankern. Die Debatte um die gesellschaftliche Aufwertung des Kulturerbes weist erhebliche Parallelen zur ökonomischen Aufwertung von Ökosystemen auf, die den Naturschutz im Zuge des globalen Umweltwandels stark beeinflusst hat. Mit der Erfindung des Konzepts der »Ökosystemleistungen« wurde ab der Jahrtausendwende eine ökonomische Argumentation zur Erhaltung der Natur eingeführt, die auf die globale Umwelt- und Entwicklungspolitik starken Einfluss ausgeübt hat und die in diesem Beitrag beleuchtet werden soll. Im Vergleich der Entwicklungen im Denkmalschutz und Naturschutz leitet der Beitrag Aussagen zu den Chancen und Risiken sowie Entwicklungspfade für eine gesellschaftliche Inwertsetzung von Kulturerbe ab.