Article
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (17) (remove)
Language
- German (17)
Keywords
- Kirchengeschichte (4)
- Schleiermacher, Friedrich (4)
- Christentum (3)
- Theologie (3)
- Edition (2)
- Editionswissenschaft (2)
- Geschichtstheorie (2)
- Harms, Claus (2)
- Kirchenkampf (2)
- Kirchenkampf <1933-1945> (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (17) (remove)
This essay deals with Friedrich Schleiermacher’s readings on ecclesiastical geography and statistics (which have been be published for the first time in 2005 as volume II/16 of the Kritische Gesamtausgabe). For Schleiermacher the ecclesiastical statistics were the last part of historical theology; he developped this subject to describe the present state of the churches in the whole world, especially their life and culture, their constitutions, and their relations with states and goverments. Though Schleiermacher’s statistics had some influence on comparative symbolics and the study of denominations as well as on Practical Theology, they could not be established as one discipline among the other theological disciplines.
This miscelle deals with the quotations from the gospels in the Syriac version of Theodore of Mopsuestia’s catechetical homilies. Many of these quotations correspond with Syriac gospel texts that are earlier than Peshitta. In one passage of Homily 14 a mixed quotation from the gospels could also be infl uenced by the old Gospel Harmony “Diatessaron”.
When Martin Luther published his Smalcald Articles in 1538, Georg Witzel, who had returned to the Catholic party some years earlier offered a polemic response; Luther and his sect, he wrote, did not heal but rather exacerbated the schism. The two foci of Witzel’s Anti-Luther, the continuity with the undivided, original, and apostolic church and the doctrine of justification, indicate already the crucial points of many later attempts for ecumenical agreement.
In Schleiermacher’s thought, according to romanticism, history and historical evolution can only be understood as the revelation and realisation of an idea within empiric world. At the end of this evolution there will be the identity of Geist (mind, spirit) and nature, idea and reality.
For Schleiermacher church history ist the middle discipline of historical theology. Between 1806 and 1826 he held three lectures on this subject and made diverse attempts to appoint the relation in which church history stands to universal history and to the idea of knowledge
and science.
In the Monarchian controversy of the beginning third century the Roman bishop Calixtus evolved his own kind of monarchianism taking in elements of Theodotian, Noëtian, Praxean, and Sabellian doctrine and of stoicism. Calixtus defined in a respectively different way, wherein the unity and binity of the one Father-Son-God consists before and after incarnation: Before incarnation God is one Spirit and one Logos, in the whole world present and efficient, one Prosopon, called Father and Son. At incarnation however the Spirit-God (Father) unifies the human flesh (Son) with himself, so that the flesh made (Father and Son), again one Prosopon, is called one God.
This article publishes the minutes of a conference held on February 26th, 1934 by prominent members of the German Lutheran churches. August Marahrens, Ernst Sommerlath, Werner Elert, Paul Fleisch, and others are discussing how to maintain the Lutheran position on conditions of the Third Reich and the Reichskirche.
This article is a report from the edition of Schleiermacher’s correspondence within the critical Schleiermacher edition (Kritische Gesamtausgabe, KGA) and puts forth a surprising revision which was discovered during work on vol. 10 (1808–1810): with the exception of one letter the letters from Schleiermacher’s sister-in-law and friend of Ernst-Moritz Arndt, Charlotte von Kathen (1778–1850), to Friedrich Schleiermacher, should be attributed to a different Charlotte, Schleiermachers’s friend Charlotte Cummerow. The correspondence between Friedrich Schleiermacher and Charlotte Cummerow was assumed until now not to have been handed down. The article shows with a look at the transmission history how this false attribution came about through Dilthey and which indications led to this revision. The delineated description here of the two correspondences is completed by a tabular overview of the revised correspondences of Schleiermacher with Charlotte von Kathen and Charlotte Cummerow.